Navigating the Human Body: Challenges in the Medical Computer Vision Tracking

Medical Computer Vision (MCV) plays a pivotal role in advancing computer-assisted interventions, benefiting a wide array of applications from image-guided surgery and motion compensation to autonomous tissue manipulation and 3D reconstruction. At its core, MCV relies on precise tracking and mapping – understanding where anatomical structures and surgical instruments are, and how they are moving. However, the unique environment inside the human body presents a formidable set of challenges for traditional computer vision algorithms. Fortunately, foundational, and application specific models are increasingly offering sophisticated solutions to overcome these complexities, paving the way for safer and more streamlined medical procedures. In this post we will review the challenges in tracking algorithms. Our goal is to address each of these challenges in our future posts. This post will examine the difficulties associated with tracking algorithms. Subsequent posts will delve into each of these challenges individually.

The Intricate Obstacles of Medical Computer Vision Tracking

Tracking and mapping within the human body is inherently difficult due to several factors that distinguish it from general computer vision tasks:

  • Low Texture Many organs, such as the colon, naturally have homogeneous appearances with low texture, making it difficult for algorithms to extract discriminative features and match points between images. This scarcity of distinct visual cues hinders reliable tracking.

  • Fluid Reflections and Specularities The presence of fluid on tissue surfaces, especially with endoscopes that have a front facing light source, creates saturated bright patches known as specularities. These reflections can obscure underlying tissue and must be effectively masked or accounted for.

  • Out-of-View Deformation Unlike rigid environments, internal organs are highly deformable. They can deform even when parts of them are outside the camera’s view, complicating the creation and maintenance of a consistent, persistent map of the scene.

  • Difficult Priors for Changing Environments The constantly changing and dynamic nature of the surgical environment makes it challenging to establish “priors” – assumptions or models that help estimate what is happening outside the camera’s frame.

  • Blood and Fluids Obscuring Vision Blood and other bodily fluids commonly present in endoscopic procedures can blur or smudge the camera lens, significantly degrading the quality of video data and making clear visualization difficult.

  • Smoke from Electrocautery During electrocautery, smoke is generated, which transforms the depth estimation problem from one with a clear path for light rays to one where the volume of smoke needs to be accounted for or removed to maintain a clear path for light rays and accurate measurements.

  • Discontinuities in Tissue Motion Traditional models often struggle to represent discontinuous motion, which occurs when different parts of tissue move independently or even detach. An example is a liver lobe moving separately from the background.

  • Generalizability and Data Bias A significant limitation in MCV is the difficulty in generating diverse and realistic datasets with ground truth data. Existing data is often biased towards general surgery and colonoscopy, with fewer datasets available for other specialties like neurosurgery, orthopedics, and plastic surgery, which affects the ability of algorithms to generalize to real clinical images. Phantom or algorithmically generated ground truth data, while helpful, still require validation on real tissue.

  • Camera Pose and Tissue Movement Decoupling In non-rigid Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), it’s challenging to separate the camera’s pose (its position and orientation) from the independent movement of the tissue without a fixed external reference. Both are in flux, influencing each other’s apparent motion.

  • Drift and Appearance Variations Existing tracking methods can suffer from accumulated errors during long-term tracking, leading to issues like drift and divergence. Static template matching, where a single reference image is used, is prone to failure when faced with drastic appearance changes, significant deformations, or occlusions over time. This includes fluctuations in illumination and camera motion.

  • Computational Costs Many algorithms, particularly those involving complex neural networks or dense reconstructions, can be computationally intensive, limiting their real-time application in the operating room or other clinical settings.

  • Uncertainty and Failure Detection For clinical deployment, tracking algorithms must be able to robustly determine when tracking fails or when estimates are unreliable. Discarding drifting points and detecting lost tracks are crucial.


At Encinalabs, we believe medical computer vision will redefine how surgical and diagnostic tools are built — making them powerful, collaborative, and fundamentally private.

If you are working on medical computer vision AI, we would love to connect. Let’s build the future together.